Talk:Glitch Slime/@comment-26001290-20181127013141/@comment-30175469-20181218085458

Twinkle wasn't present at the time of posting so "actually 5 if you count twinkle" has issues wording wise. That word choice implies a correction of the statement, which given an actual time line, it is rather an expansion than a correction.

In some cases we do correct historic comments or explanations for things, but every case of that it is rather new information to describe an old concept or property that wasn't formerly explored. But in this case this is literal new existance. So while your point is correct, the word choice was quite poor here...