Talk:Casey/@comment-36114753-20180926224855/@comment-30175469-20180927131735

On note for Connie. For said event to be canon, then that would give Casey a cannon gender, which they do not have. Second off, that would imply a lack of alternative orientations that meet the current given criteria if Casey had a canon gender. So to state said thought is cannon assumes something else, and then requires a second assumption based off of the prior assumption.

And given the fact the two went their seperate ways, the term "are" only builds on that assumption a bit. As far as head cannon goes, this isn't uncommon. As far as "cannon" goes, too many assumptions are made (and existing information might I add) to truely call this cannon.